| Peer-Reviewed

Finite Element Analysis of Cable-Stayed Cantilever Material Transfer Platform Under Varying Loading Conditions

Received: 31 May 2022    Accepted:     Published: 1 June 2022
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

During the construction of building structures, the transfer platform is the main passage of materials entering or departing the floor, and it is an important facility for site operation. In recent years, a large number of construction accidents have occurred due to unsafe design and unreasonable site practices of the transfer platform, and serious accidents may result in injury or death. Aiming at the decrease of construction accidents of the transfer platform, this paper studied the force characteristics of the cable-stayed cantilever material transfer platform under varying loading conditions using the finite element method. The maximum load-carrying capacity of the transfer platform was obtained, and the most unfavorable position of the material load was analyzed. The performance in service of the transfer platform under various adverse conditions such as partial load and anchorage failure was studied. The results show that when the load area is less than or equal to 0.5m×0.5m, the maximum load-carrying capacity of the transfer platform is 8kN after considering the dynamic coefficient. When the material load is located in the middle of the transfer platform, the transfer platform has a good safety margin. And when the main girder anchor bodies or wire rope anchorages are not anchored, the transfer platform cannot be used.

Published in American Journal of Civil Engineering (Volume 10, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajce.20221003.13
Page(s) 109-115
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Transfer Platform, Adverse Conditions, Finite Element Method, Load-Carrying Capacity

References
[1] D. C. Yue, C. G. Meng, X. M Sun, et al. “Optimization design and construction of discharging platform of an engineering,” Construction Technology. vol. 45, 2016, pp. 127-129. (in Chinese).
[2] W. W. Wu, H. J. Yang, D. A. S. Chew, et al. “Towards an autonomous real-time tracking system of near-miss accidents on construction sites,” Automation in Construction. vol. 19, 2010, pp134-141.
[3] H. Jung, B. Choi, S. Kang, et al. “Temporal analysis of the frequency of accidents associated with construction equipment,” Safety Science. vol. 153, 2022, 105817.
[4] K. Koc, A. P. Gurgun, “Scenario-based automated data preprocessing to predict severity of construction accidents,” Automation in Construction. vol. 140, 2022, 104351.
[5] Y. M. Zhu, J. J. Zhou, B. Zhang, et al. “Statistical analysis of major tunnel construction accidents in China from 2010 to 2020,” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. vol. 124, 2022, 104460.
[6] Z. P. Zhou, J. Irizarry, J. L. Zhou, “Development of a database exclusively for subway construction accidents and corresponding analyses,” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. vol. 111, 2021, 103852.
[7] S. R. Mohandes, H. Sadeghi, A. Fazeli, et al. “Causal analysis of accidents on construction sites: A hybrid fuzzy Delphi and DEMATEL approach,” Safety Science. vol. 151, 2022, 105730.
[8] G. Carter, S. D. Smith. “Safety hazard identification on construction projects,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. vol. 132, 2006.
[9] N. XU, L. MA, Q. Liu, et al. “An improved text mining approach to extract safety risk factors from construction accident reports,” Safety Science. vol. 138, 2021, 105216.
[10] K. Koc, Ö. Ekmekcioğlu, A. P. Gurgun, “Accident prediction in construction using hybrid wavelet-machine learning,” Automation in Construction. vol. 133, 2022, 103987.
[11] E. D. Fonseca, “Accident and innovation in construction industry: Learning by doing to prevent accidents and improve the production,” Safety Science. vol. 142, 2021, 105389.
[12] E. Dogan, M. A. Yurdusev, S. A. Yildizel, et al. “Investigation of scaffolding accident in a construction site: A case study analysis,” Engineering Failure Analysis. vol. 120, 2021, 105108.
[13] A. R. Barriuso, B. M. V. Escribano, A. R. Sáiz. “The importance of preventive training actions for the reduction of workplace accidents within the Spanish construction sector,” Safety Science. vol. 134, 2021, 105090.
[14] J. Jeong, J. Jeong. “Novel approach of the integrated work & risk breakdown structure for identifying the hierarchy of fatal incident in construction industry,” Journal of Building Engineering. vol. 41, 2021, 102406.
[15] S. Z. Wu, L. Hou, G. M. Zhang, H. S. Chen. “Real-time mixed reality-based visual warning for construction workforce safety,” Automation in Construction. vol 139, 2022, 104252.
[16] J. Ge, Y. Y. Zhang, S. K. Chen, et al. “Accident causation models developed in China between 1978 and 2018: Review and comparison,” Safety Science. vol. 148, 2022, 105653.
[17] M. Yang. “Design example and safety management of overhanging unloading platform,” Engineering Construction. vol. 54, 2022, pp. 69-73. (in Chinese).
[18] S. Mohamed. “Safety climate in construction site environments,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. vol. 128, 2002.
[19] A. D. Rafindadi, M. Napiah, I. Othman, et al. “Analysis of the causes and preventive measures of fatal fall-related accidents in the construction industry,” Ain Shams Engineering Journal. vol. 13, 2022, 101712.
[20] H. J. Yang, D. A. S. Chew, W. W. Wu, et al. “Design and implementation of an identification system in construction site safety for proactive accident prevention,” Accident Analysis and Prevention. vol. 48, 2012, pp. 193-203.
[21] W. Bryan, P. Christopher, L. Tim, et al. “Evaluating the stability of a freestanding mast climbing work platform,” Journal of Safety Research. vol. 62, 2017, pp. 163-172.
[22] S. M. Bosˇnjak, N. B. Gnjatovic´, D. B. Momcˇilovic´, et al. “Failure analysis of the mobile elevating work platform,” Case Studies in Engineering Failure Analysis. vol. 3, 2015, pp. 80-87.
[23] U. Erinç, T. Gökhan. “Design and analysis of hydraulic truck unloading platforms”, Çukurova University Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture. vol. 32, 2017, pp. 55-62.
[24] N. Wang, G. Wang, G. Q. Chen, et al. “Finite element analysis of unloading sheet pile wharf with ABAQUS,” IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. vol. 567, 2020, 012004.
[25] J. D. J. Ochoa-Olán, E. Betanzo-Quezada, J. A. Romero-Navarrete. “A modeling and micro-simulation approach to estimate the location, number and size of loading/unloading bays: A case study in the city of Querétaro, Mexico,” Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives. vol. 10, 2021, 100400.
[26] H. Zhao, R. Wang, Q. M. Li, et al. “Experimental and numerical investigation on impact and post-impact behaviours of H-shaped steel members,” Engineering Structures. vol. 216, 2020, 110750.
[27] H. T. Hu, B. K. Lee, Y. F. Huang, et al. “Performance analysis on transfer platforms in frame bridge based automated container terminals,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering. vol. 2013, 2013, 593847.
[28] N. Wang, G. Wang, G. Q. Chen, et al. “Finite element analysis of unloading sheet pile wharf with ABAQUS,” Earth and Environmental Science. vol. 567, 2020, 012004.
[29] N. Kaya, Ö. Anil. “Prediction of load capacity of one way reinforced concrete slabs with openings using nonlinear finite element analysis,” Journal of Building Engineering. vol. 44, 2021, 102945.
[30] M. E. Shemshadian, A. E. Schultz, J. L. Le, et al. “Structural mechanics characterization of steel intermeshed connection using nonlinear finite element analysis,” Engineering Structures. vol. 238, 2021, 112264.
[31] M. A. Alegre, R. Tremblay. “Finite element analysis of flexural response of steel joist top chord extensions,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research. vol. 190, 2022, 107122.
[32] T. S. Zhao, W. Liu, J. F. Liu, et al. “Study on the safety of drawer type unloading platform,” Science Technology and Engineering. vol. 16, 2016, pp. 275-282. (in Chinese).
[33] “Standard for design of steel structures-GB50017-2017,” China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing, 2017. (in Chinese).
[34] “Load code for the design of building structures- GB50009-2012,” China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing, 2012. (in Chinese).
[35] S. Yan, K. J. R. Rasmussen. “Generalised Component Method-based finite element analysis of steel frames,” Journal of Constructional Steel Research. vol. 187, 2021, 106949.
[36] J. McConnell, M. Radovic, P. Keller. “Holistic finite element analysis to evaluate influence of cross-frames in skewed steel I-girder bridges,” Engineering Structures. vol. 213, 2020, 110556.
[37] A. Jawdhari, A. H. Adheem, M. M. A. Kadhim. “Parametric 3D finite element analysis of FRCM-confined RC columns under eccentric loading,” Engineering Structures. vol. 212, 2020, 110504.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Haifeng Yu, Chun Wang, Jinyuan Li, Wenjun Ji, Deqiang Yu, et al. (2022). Finite Element Analysis of Cable-Stayed Cantilever Material Transfer Platform Under Varying Loading Conditions. American Journal of Civil Engineering, 10(3), 109-115. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20221003.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Haifeng Yu; Chun Wang; Jinyuan Li; Wenjun Ji; Deqiang Yu, et al. Finite Element Analysis of Cable-Stayed Cantilever Material Transfer Platform Under Varying Loading Conditions. Am. J. Civ. Eng. 2022, 10(3), 109-115. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20221003.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Haifeng Yu, Chun Wang, Jinyuan Li, Wenjun Ji, Deqiang Yu, et al. Finite Element Analysis of Cable-Stayed Cantilever Material Transfer Platform Under Varying Loading Conditions. Am J Civ Eng. 2022;10(3):109-115. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20221003.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajce.20221003.13,
      author = {Haifeng Yu and Chun Wang and Jinyuan Li and Wenjun Ji and Deqiang Yu and Hao Wang and Jiaqi Li},
      title = {Finite Element Analysis of Cable-Stayed Cantilever Material Transfer Platform Under Varying Loading Conditions},
      journal = {American Journal of Civil Engineering},
      volume = {10},
      number = {3},
      pages = {109-115},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajce.20221003.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20221003.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajce.20221003.13},
      abstract = {During the construction of building structures, the transfer platform is the main passage of materials entering or departing the floor, and it is an important facility for site operation. In recent years, a large number of construction accidents have occurred due to unsafe design and unreasonable site practices of the transfer platform, and serious accidents may result in injury or death. Aiming at the decrease of construction accidents of the transfer platform, this paper studied the force characteristics of the cable-stayed cantilever material transfer platform under varying loading conditions using the finite element method. The maximum load-carrying capacity of the transfer platform was obtained, and the most unfavorable position of the material load was analyzed. The performance in service of the transfer platform under various adverse conditions such as partial load and anchorage failure was studied. The results show that when the load area is less than or equal to 0.5m×0.5m, the maximum load-carrying capacity of the transfer platform is 8kN after considering the dynamic coefficient. When the material load is located in the middle of the transfer platform, the transfer platform has a good safety margin. And when the main girder anchor bodies or wire rope anchorages are not anchored, the transfer platform cannot be used.},
     year = {2022}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Finite Element Analysis of Cable-Stayed Cantilever Material Transfer Platform Under Varying Loading Conditions
    AU  - Haifeng Yu
    AU  - Chun Wang
    AU  - Jinyuan Li
    AU  - Wenjun Ji
    AU  - Deqiang Yu
    AU  - Hao Wang
    AU  - Jiaqi Li
    Y1  - 2022/06/01
    PY  - 2022
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20221003.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajce.20221003.13
    T2  - American Journal of Civil Engineering
    JF  - American Journal of Civil Engineering
    JO  - American Journal of Civil Engineering
    SP  - 109
    EP  - 115
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-8737
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20221003.13
    AB  - During the construction of building structures, the transfer platform is the main passage of materials entering or departing the floor, and it is an important facility for site operation. In recent years, a large number of construction accidents have occurred due to unsafe design and unreasonable site practices of the transfer platform, and serious accidents may result in injury or death. Aiming at the decrease of construction accidents of the transfer platform, this paper studied the force characteristics of the cable-stayed cantilever material transfer platform under varying loading conditions using the finite element method. The maximum load-carrying capacity of the transfer platform was obtained, and the most unfavorable position of the material load was analyzed. The performance in service of the transfer platform under various adverse conditions such as partial load and anchorage failure was studied. The results show that when the load area is less than or equal to 0.5m×0.5m, the maximum load-carrying capacity of the transfer platform is 8kN after considering the dynamic coefficient. When the material load is located in the middle of the transfer platform, the transfer platform has a good safety margin. And when the main girder anchor bodies or wire rope anchorages are not anchored, the transfer platform cannot be used.
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • School of Civil Engineering, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang, China

  • School of Civil Engineering, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang, China

  • China Construction First Bureau (Group) Second Construction Co., Ltd, Beijing, China

  • China Construction First Bureau (Group) Second Construction Co., Ltd, Beijing, China

  • China Construction First Bureau (Group) Second Construction Co., Ltd, Beijing, China

  • China Construction First Bureau (Group) Second Construction Co., Ltd, Beijing, China

  • School of Civil Engineering, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang, China

  • Sections